Hello,
is it possible to open a report in fullscreenmode automatically? Perhaps there might be a http parameter?
Current view:
Now a click on the button on the right side. This is the view i want to see when i open a report.
Did anyone have an idea how i can achieve my goal?
Thanks for your help!
Christian Niehaves
is it possible to disable all DML triggers for the current session only?
This is for manual data correction sessions where no trigger should be fired but all other user connection still should have active triggers.
Cheers,I don't think you can do this without modifying your trigger. You can use SUSER_NAME() function inside your trigger and if it matches with the login user bypass the execution.
to be specific.
The first line of trigger code will be if SUSER_NAME() = 'Manuel' return|||I can second that, you will have to implement some additional logic to make this possible.
HTH, Jens K. Suessmeyer.
http://www.sqlserver2005.de
Is there a way do disable/disallow implicit casting in Sql Server 2000?
Say for example:
if ' ' = 0 select getdate()
This wil print out the current date and time.
But ' ' (a string, varchar, whatever) is not the same type as 0 (say, int). Implicit casting is nice, but is there also an off switch?
I've looked at the book Itzik Ben-Gan (T-SQL Programming). On the paragraph about implicit conversion he doesn't cite any way to switch it off. He also suggests that in some case may be useful to explicit cast data to sql_variant and reports the following example, that maybe can suggest a workaround:
select
case
when 1>1 then 10
when 1=1 then 'abc'
when 1<1 then 10
end;
select
case
when 1>1 then cast(10 as sql_variant)
when 1=1 then cast('abc' as sql_variant)
when 1<1 then cast(10 as sql_variant)
end;
MS help says also that "Implicit conversions are not visible to the user", so I guess there's no way to disable it.
Take a look also at the following docs:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms191530.aspx
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms190309.aspx|||
Thanks.
It's really weird. I would have suspected an feature like 'option strict' like there is in VB (and for a good reason). It's a shame it's not there in T-SQL.
Hi,
I have a package comprising a number of Data Flow Task steps, to import various tables of data from some Access databases into SQL Server. The name of some of these Access databases will change depending on the date, e.g. last year's data is currently in a database called "2005data.mdb". At year end this will be superseded by "2006data.mdb". The Access databases are within a 3rd party system so I have no control over the file names.
I have a Script Task that checks the current date, and changes the name of an Access database in the connection string to reflect last year's date. But to complicate matters, last year's file might not exist.
So the Script Task checks whether the file name exists. If not, I would like to disable the Task that uses this connection. But how do I reference a task within the package that contains my Script Task, by name, to set the Disabled attribute to true?
I want to do something like CurrentPackage.Tasks("MyDataFlowTask").Disabled = True.
I would also welcome alternative suggestions for how to achieve this.
Many thanks,
Keith.
You cannot reference inwards within a package, so you cannot reference a task. The task must reference the value. The way to do this is to set a variable, and use a property expression that uses that variable value. So you would set a variable, DisableMyTask as true to false in the script then set the property expression on the task's Disable property to that variable, "@.DisableMyTask".
I would however be careful using the Disable property, as the evaluation can be done before you set the variable, so it is too late. A better way to do this is to use an expression on Workflow. Have a constraint leading to your task, and then just add the variable as the test, or rather the negative, so that the constraint is only satisfied when the variable is false. If you have no preceding task to anchor the constraint, just use a sequence container. It will act as an anchor, but do nothing else.
|||Keith,
You can also add an Expression to the constraint from your Script Task that is modifying the connection string. By doing so you can control the flow without having to enable/disable the invalid tasks.
Here's a link on how to add expressions to a precendence constraint: http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms140040.aspx
Cheers,
Patrik
Hi,
Thanks for the replies. I have tried adding expressions to the precedence constraints, but it is not working correctly.
I originally had 7 Tasks, with a simple precedence constraint of Success between one and the next. I've now added an expression based on a variable, and changed the precedence constraint to "Constraint and Expression", but with this change, steps 5 to 7 no longer execute. They are still validated, but do not Start.
In simplistic terms, the logic I have added is:
After Task 3, if Success and (@.boolPCStatsLastYearExists) then Execute Task 4.
After Task 4, if Success, execute Task 5.
After Task 3, if Success and (@.boolPCStatsLastYearExists = False) then Execute Task 5.
So, whether the boolean value @.boolPCStatsLastYearExists is True or False, Task 5 should be executed. In fact I think it is set to True, because Task 4 executes and creates rows in the database, so it appears Task 4 is executing but Task 5 isn't.
I am developing on my local machine, but cannot run locally (I get an error on the first Data Flow Task), because the SQL database is on a server. So I am deploying to the server and running there.
Can you advise how I should get debugging information to indicate what happens after Task 4 executes, and why Task 5 isn't reached?
Many thanks,
Keith.
|||To debug stuff, use the debugger. Creating a mock DB on your local machine would be a good idea.
Sounds like you have two constraints leading to task 5, but they follow different, mutually exclusive execution paths. So you will never satisfy both constraints in a single execution, correct? If so, have you turned the Or logic option on for those constsraints? It is in the constraint UI, or the LogicalAnd property of the constraint, set it to false.
|||Hi again,
Thanks for that. I had left the default setting (AND) on the constraints. Changing all the constraints where 2 constraints affect one task, led to some progress.
Tasks 1 - 6 now execute fine. But Task 7 never executes.
The constraints on it are:
From Task 5, Success AND @.boolPCFDR1LastYearExists = False
OR
From Task 6, Success.
The first of these conditions should be met, as Task 5 succeeds and writes data, and the boolean is set to False by Task 1 (the Script task), which I can verify in the debugger.
I would greatly appreciate any further suggestions. However, I suspect I will now need to install SQL Server on my already overloaded laptop and recreate the server database locally, so that I can debug. But having looked at the debugger, I am not confident I will have a sufficiently granular view to identify the problem. I'll report back!
Thanks for all your help so far,
Keith.
|||Hi,
OK, I've installed SQL Server locally, copied the database to it, and changed my connection to point to the local database. The same error occurs, and I don't see how to use the debugger to help me resolve it.
I can put a stop in Step 5 Post-Execute, but I can't do any more than verify that the boolean is set to False as expected. What can I do to identify why the processor does not proceed to execute Step 7?
Thanks,
Keith.
|||Solved! (Sort of). I've had a problem with conditions on a precedence constraint. I can set a condition of @.myBooleanVariable, and it executes correctly, only when the variable is set to true. However, I can't find a syntax to say execute when this boolean is False. I tried the obvious NOT @.myBooleanVariable, but this does not pass the syntax check. @.myBooleanVariable = False passes the syntax check, but crucially, does not execute. I've not found another syntax that is accepted.
So reluctantly, I created 2 new variables, set them to the boolean opposite of the 2 existing variables, and used them in my "negative" conditions. So all my conditions on Precedence Constraints now comprise just the name of a boolean variable, prefixed with @..
Thanks,
Keith.
|||Keith,
In the expressions not is represented with ! and equivalency is tested with ==. This should help you remove the additional variable.
Cheers,
Patrik
