显示标签为“appear”的博文。显示所有博文
显示标签为“appear”的博文。显示所有博文

2012年3月29日星期四

Disks not appearing in "My Computer"

I have a clustered environment which includes 2 nodes. The cluster
fails across fine but the only issue is the disks do not appear in My
Computer. When I connect to the disks through Windows disk management
all the disks are there.
Any ideas?
Many thanks
The clustered drives which are called resources are held by the node which is
the active one. At any point of time, only one node can hold the resources.
"Edwin vMierlo [MVP]" wrote:

> Clustered disks are only accessible on the node where they are online.
> Rgds,
> Edwin.
>
> <Joe.Mobley@.nationalexpress.com> wrote in message
> news:1178015037.826526.300420@.h2g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com...
>
>

2012年3月27日星期二

disk queuing

I appear to have 100% disk queuing performance problems even when there are
not any users interigating data?
This leads to blocking when users do attempt to run data interegation.
We have a 3Gb processor running 2Gb of Ram
I have watched the performance monitor endlessly and the problem is
intermitant, the CPU usage is barely used
Please can anyone direct me towards the problem?Probably related to checkpoints. Lookup Checkpoint in BooksOnLine for more
details. You can monitor when this happens with Perfmon and the SQL
CheckPoint per Second counter. Or something else is going on with the
server that you are not aware of.
--
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Michael Ayers" <michael.ayers(RemoveThis)@.phonetics.co.uk> wrote in message
news:B5D9F392-3ADF-4B4B-A48F-500398DFC377@.microsoft.com...
>I appear to have 100% disk queuing performance problems even when there are
> not any users interigating data?
> This leads to blocking when users do attempt to run data interegation.
> We have a 3Gb processor running 2Gb of Ram
> I have watched the performance monitor endlessly and the problem is
> intermitant, the CPU usage is barely used
> Please can anyone direct me towards the problem?sql

disk queuing

I appear to have 100% disk queuing performance problems even when there are
not any users interigating data?
This leads to blocking when users do attempt to run data interegation.
We have a 3Gb processor running 2Gb of Ram
I have watched the performance monitor endlessly and the problem is
intermitant, the CPU usage is barely used
Please can anyone direct me towards the problem?
Probably related to checkpoints. Lookup Checkpoint in BooksOnLine for more
details. You can monitor when this happens with Perfmon and the SQL
CheckPoint per Second counter. Or something else is going on with the
server that you are not aware of.
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Michael Ayers" <michael.ayers(RemoveThis)@.phonetics.co.uk> wrote in message
news:B5D9F392-3ADF-4B4B-A48F-500398DFC377@.microsoft.com...
>I appear to have 100% disk queuing performance problems even when there are
> not any users interigating data?
> This leads to blocking when users do attempt to run data interegation.
> We have a 3Gb processor running 2Gb of Ram
> I have watched the performance monitor endlessly and the problem is
> intermitant, the CPU usage is barely used
> Please can anyone direct me towards the problem?

disk queuing

I appear to have 100% disk queuing performance problems even when there are
not any users interigating data?
This leads to blocking when users do attempt to run data interegation.
We have a 3Gb processor running 2Gb of Ram
I have watched the performance monitor endlessly and the problem is
intermitant, the CPU usage is barely used
Please can anyone direct me towards the problem?Probably related to checkpoints. Lookup Checkpoint in BooksOnLine for more
details. You can monitor when this happens with Perfmon and the SQL
CheckPoint per Second counter. Or something else is going on with the
server that you are not aware of.
Andrew J. Kelly SQL MVP
"Michael Ayers" <michael.ayers(RemoveThis)@.phonetics.co.uk> wrote in message
news:B5D9F392-3ADF-4B4B-A48F-500398DFC377@.microsoft.com...
>I appear to have 100% disk queuing performance problems even when there are
> not any users interigating data?
> This leads to blocking when users do attempt to run data interegation.
> We have a 3Gb processor running 2Gb of Ram
> I have watched the performance monitor endlessly and the problem is
> intermitant, the CPU usage is barely used
> Please can anyone direct me towards the problem?

2012年3月8日星期四

Disappearing Parameterised Filters and Filter Joins in Publication Properties page of replicatio

Hi,

We have an issue with our replication configuration when viewed through replication monitor. Parameterised Filters and joined filters don't appear in the gui. However, when we script the publication all the filters are present.

This issue only seems to occur when we have a remote distributor.

I should also point out that we have a merge push topology that uses a custom RMO synchronisation component on a separate server to either the publisher or the distributor. Also all the databases in the topology are called the same name. This has caused us other issues relating to this topology in particular so I raise it here as well although I don't expect it to be the case in this instance.

Any help would be greatly appreciated in clarifying this matter.

To get better response, can you submit this bug/issue to http://connect.microsoft.com? We can track it better there, thanks!

Disappearing Parameterised Filters and Filter Joins in Publication Properties page of replic

Hi,

We have an issue with our replication configuration when viewed through replication monitor. Parameterised Filters and joined filters don't appear in the gui. However, when we script the publication all the filters are present.

This issue only seems to occur when we have a remote distributor.

I should also point out that we have a merge push topology that uses a custom RMO synchronisation component on a separate server to either the publisher or the distributor. Also all the databases in the topology are called the same name. This has caused us other issues relating to this topology in particular so I raise it here as well although I don't expect it to be the case in this instance.

Any help would be greatly appreciated in clarifying this matter.

To get better response, can you submit this bug/issue to http://connect.microsoft.com? We can track it better there, thanks!